During debate on the House floor on Friday, Dunnigan said that in addition to providing “a hand-up” to some of Utah’s poor, the measure was the fiscally-responsible option.
“It respects the taxpayer…by saying we will provide coverage to as many people as we can within our budgetary appropriations,” Dunnigan said.
But several Democrats voiced their opposition to the measure, saying that full medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act would cover tens of thousands of more people, while better leveraging federal funding.
Salt Lake Democratic Rep. Rebecca Chavez-Houck said that while there were better options available, Dunnigan’s bill was difficult to support.
“I do resent being pressed into a Sophie’s choice – having to choose which of two children should be left behind,” she said.
Dunnigan’s proposal, which would cost the state roughly $30 million, doesn’t take any of the tens of millions of dollars available as a federal match through the Affordable Care Act and instead expands upon the traditional Medicaid program. The proposal would also require a waiver from the federal government to be implemented.
HB437 now heads to the Senate. Meanwhile a measure by Senate Minority Leader Gene Davis that calls for Utah to accept full Medicaid expansion is also awaiting debate on the Senate floor.
How do you feel about this topic?
Is there anything else you think we should know? We'd like to hear your thoughts. Send us your feedback using the form below.